Morgan Rogers
CHE • MID • £7.9m
Projection Models Matrix
Toggle sites to recalculate the average and graph
Expected points
Average of ticked sources
Lowest to highest source
Below / near / above average
| Source |
GW 8 TOT (h) |
GW 9 MUN (h) |
GW 10 SUN (a) |
GW 11 LEE (h) |
GW 12 NFO (a) |
GW 13 CRY (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.50 | 4.40 | 4.00 | 4.60 | 4.00 | - | |
| 5.02 | 4.85 | 4.78 | 5.02 | 4.79 | 5.53 | |
| 5.00 | 4.80 | 4.60 | 4.90 | 4.40 | 5.10 | |
| 5.73 | 5.20 | 5.13 | 5.72 | 5.10 | - | |
| 5.48 | 5.12 | 5.03 | 5.46 | - | - | |
| Average | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Article Mentions
4 Mentions
"A: I touched on this last week, when I said I preferred Gibbs-White to Morgan Rogers (£7.7m) over a longer period."
"In terms of open-play goal threat, I think Rogers is the superior pick, which is backed up by the underlying numbers in the first four Gameweeks…"
"But what pushes Gibbs-White beyond players like Rogers, Antoine Semenyo (£8.4m) and Cody Gakpo (£7.2m) is his role on set plays, plus potential penalties, having scored from the spot in Gameweek 2 with Igor Jesus (£5.8m) and Liam Delap (£5.5m) on the pitch."
"If you’d rather keep him, you could perhaps switch Palmer to Rogers, then move Wissa to Pedro, although I’m a bit less keen on that due to penalties."
Similar MIDs to consider
